GERY - Faculty of Geography Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Geography
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   GERY
  • Geografski fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   GERY
  • Geografski fakultet
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Defining the centers of labor in urban area: Example of Belgrade

Definisanje centara rada u urbanom prostoru - primer Beograda

Thumbnail
2008
269.pdf (281.3Kb)
Authors
Ratkaj, Ivan
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Simplifying city organization and its a priori reduction on one urban center, leads potentially toward series of wrong conclusions. Followers of monocentrism base their starting points on the fact that central business city zone mostly remains the dominant center of labor although its relative significance is falling. That is why, for example, urban dispersion is still being defined on relatively simple parametric models, based on one gradient of density in relation to central business zone (here the gradient of density represents the unit of dispersion). However, conclusion on city dispersion based on such an approach may result from wrongly formulated model-mono-centric model in really existing polycentric urban context. Thus, the explanation for the existing gradient of density of working places may be their larger concentrations within sub centers located out of the central business zone (while the significance of the central business zone is falling, it may happen that the total a...ggregate concentration of working places is getting larger).

Pojednostavljivanje organizacije grada i njeno a priori svođenje na jedan urbani centar, potencijalno vodi nizu pogrešnih zaključaka. Pristalice monocentrizma svoje polazište baziraju na činjenici da, iako njen relativni značaj opada, centralna poslovna zona grada u većini slučajeva ostaje dominantan centar rada. Zato se urbana disperzija i danas često definiše relativno jednostavnim parametarskim modelima, zasnovanim na jednom gradijentu gustine u odnosu na centralnu poslovnu zonu (gradijent gustine ovde predstavlja meru disperzije). Međutim, zaključak o disperznosti grada zasnovan na ovakvom pristupu može proisticati iz pogrešno formulisanog modela - monocentričnog modela u realno postojećem policentričnom urbanom kontekstu. Tako, objašnjenje za postojeći gradijent gustine radnih mesta, mogu biti njihove veće koncentracije unutar subcentara lociranih izvan centralne poslovne zone (dok značaj centralne poslovne zone opada, može se dogoditi da je ukupna agregatna koncentracija radnih m...esta veća).

Keywords:
Belgrade / centers of labor / polycentric model / Beograd / centri rada / policentrični model
Source:
Zbornik radova - Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, 2008, 56, 117-130
Publisher:
  • Univerzitet u Beogradu - Geografski fakultet, Beograd
Funding / projects:
  • Geosistemske osnove prostorno-funkcionalne organizacije Republike Srbije (RS-146010)

ISSN: 1450-7552

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_271
URI
https://gery.gef.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/271
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
Geografski fakultet
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ratkaj, Ivan
PY  - 2008
UR  - https://gery.gef.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/271
AB  - Simplifying city organization and its a priori reduction on one urban center, leads potentially toward series of wrong conclusions. Followers of monocentrism base their starting points on the fact that central business city zone mostly remains the dominant center of labor although its relative significance is falling. That is why, for example, urban dispersion is still being defined on relatively simple parametric models, based on one gradient of density in relation to central business zone (here the gradient of density represents the unit of dispersion). However, conclusion on city dispersion based on such an approach may result from wrongly formulated model-mono-centric model in really existing polycentric urban context. Thus, the explanation for the existing gradient of density of working places may be their larger concentrations within sub centers located out of the central business zone (while the significance of the central business zone is falling, it may happen that the total aggregate concentration of working places is getting larger).
AB  - Pojednostavljivanje organizacije grada i njeno a priori svođenje na jedan urbani centar, potencijalno vodi nizu pogrešnih zaključaka. Pristalice monocentrizma svoje polazište baziraju na činjenici da, iako njen relativni značaj opada, centralna poslovna zona grada u većini slučajeva ostaje dominantan centar rada. Zato se urbana disperzija i danas često definiše relativno jednostavnim parametarskim modelima, zasnovanim na jednom gradijentu gustine u odnosu na centralnu poslovnu zonu (gradijent gustine ovde predstavlja meru disperzije). Međutim, zaključak o disperznosti grada zasnovan na ovakvom pristupu može proisticati iz pogrešno formulisanog modela - monocentričnog modela u realno postojećem policentričnom urbanom kontekstu. Tako, objašnjenje za postojeći gradijent gustine radnih mesta, mogu biti njihove veće koncentracije unutar subcentara lociranih izvan centralne poslovne zone (dok značaj centralne poslovne zone opada, može se dogoditi da je ukupna agregatna koncentracija radnih mesta veća).
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Geografski fakultet, Beograd
T2  - Zbornik radova - Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
T1  - Defining the centers of labor in urban area: Example of Belgrade
T1  - Definisanje centara rada u urbanom prostoru - primer Beograda
IS  - 56
SP  - 117
EP  - 130
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_271
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ratkaj, Ivan",
year = "2008",
abstract = "Simplifying city organization and its a priori reduction on one urban center, leads potentially toward series of wrong conclusions. Followers of monocentrism base their starting points on the fact that central business city zone mostly remains the dominant center of labor although its relative significance is falling. That is why, for example, urban dispersion is still being defined on relatively simple parametric models, based on one gradient of density in relation to central business zone (here the gradient of density represents the unit of dispersion). However, conclusion on city dispersion based on such an approach may result from wrongly formulated model-mono-centric model in really existing polycentric urban context. Thus, the explanation for the existing gradient of density of working places may be their larger concentrations within sub centers located out of the central business zone (while the significance of the central business zone is falling, it may happen that the total aggregate concentration of working places is getting larger)., Pojednostavljivanje organizacije grada i njeno a priori svođenje na jedan urbani centar, potencijalno vodi nizu pogrešnih zaključaka. Pristalice monocentrizma svoje polazište baziraju na činjenici da, iako njen relativni značaj opada, centralna poslovna zona grada u većini slučajeva ostaje dominantan centar rada. Zato se urbana disperzija i danas često definiše relativno jednostavnim parametarskim modelima, zasnovanim na jednom gradijentu gustine u odnosu na centralnu poslovnu zonu (gradijent gustine ovde predstavlja meru disperzije). Međutim, zaključak o disperznosti grada zasnovan na ovakvom pristupu može proisticati iz pogrešno formulisanog modela - monocentričnog modela u realno postojećem policentričnom urbanom kontekstu. Tako, objašnjenje za postojeći gradijent gustine radnih mesta, mogu biti njihove veće koncentracije unutar subcentara lociranih izvan centralne poslovne zone (dok značaj centralne poslovne zone opada, može se dogoditi da je ukupna agregatna koncentracija radnih mesta veća).",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Geografski fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Zbornik radova - Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu",
title = "Defining the centers of labor in urban area: Example of Belgrade, Definisanje centara rada u urbanom prostoru - primer Beograda",
number = "56",
pages = "117-130",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_271"
}
Ratkaj, I.. (2008). Defining the centers of labor in urban area: Example of Belgrade. in Zbornik radova - Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Geografski fakultet, Beograd.(56), 117-130.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_271
Ratkaj I. Defining the centers of labor in urban area: Example of Belgrade. in Zbornik radova - Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. 2008;(56):117-130.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_271 .
Ratkaj, Ivan, "Defining the centers of labor in urban area: Example of Belgrade" in Zbornik radova - Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, no. 56 (2008):117-130,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_271 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About GERY - GEography RepositoRY | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About GERY - GEography RepositoRY | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB