TY  - JOUR
AU  - Miljković, Đurđa
AU  - Bozić, Sanja
AU  - Miljković, Ljupče
AU  - Marković, Slobodan B.
AU  - Lukić, Tin
AU  - Jovanović, Mladen
AU  - Bjelajac, Dajana
AU  - Vasiljević, Đorđije A.
AU  - Vujičić, Miroslav D.
AU  - Ristanović, Branko
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://gery.gef.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/942
AB  - Hydrological heritage is a relatively new concept in the field of geosite assessment. The principal aim of this study is to apply M-GAM (Modified geosite assessment model) for comparative analysis of the Krupaja spring and the Zagubica (Mlava) spring, located in Homolje area, in Eastern Serbia. According to the classification of geosites of Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, these sites are on the list of protected sites ("hydro(geo)logical" heritage sites) of extraordinary national importance; however, they still have not gained necessary recognition in Serbia. Thus, their assessment according to different target groups should provide a clearer picture of their current condition. As M-GAM considers that not all indicators for evaluation of geosites are of the same importance, this paper applies two methods for comparing and determining the importance of indicators and subindicators in the model (Analytical-hierarchy process (AHP) and descriptive statistics conducted by SPSS). Also, it is assumed that different target groups will give different importance to some indicators in the model, which would result in various evaluation scores for the same geosites. The paper also provides a comparative analysis of the assessment carried out by two different target groups - potential geotourists and geoexperts. The results obtained by AHP and descriptive statistics are quite similar, which confirms the reliability of respondents' answers and the results gained. The analyzed sites are differently positioned in the evaluation matrix, and implications are further discussed in the paper.
PB  - De Gruyter Open Access
T2  - Open Geosciences
T1  - Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Zagubica Springs - Hydrological Heritage of Serbia
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
SP  - 192
EP  - 208
DO  - 10.1515/geo-2018-0015
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_942
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Miljković, Đurđa and Bozić, Sanja and Miljković, Ljupče and Marković, Slobodan B. and Lukić, Tin and Jovanović, Mladen and Bjelajac, Dajana and Vasiljević, Đorđije A. and Vujičić, Miroslav D. and Ristanović, Branko",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Hydrological heritage is a relatively new concept in the field of geosite assessment. The principal aim of this study is to apply M-GAM (Modified geosite assessment model) for comparative analysis of the Krupaja spring and the Zagubica (Mlava) spring, located in Homolje area, in Eastern Serbia. According to the classification of geosites of Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, these sites are on the list of protected sites ("hydro(geo)logical" heritage sites) of extraordinary national importance; however, they still have not gained necessary recognition in Serbia. Thus, their assessment according to different target groups should provide a clearer picture of their current condition. As M-GAM considers that not all indicators for evaluation of geosites are of the same importance, this paper applies two methods for comparing and determining the importance of indicators and subindicators in the model (Analytical-hierarchy process (AHP) and descriptive statistics conducted by SPSS). Also, it is assumed that different target groups will give different importance to some indicators in the model, which would result in various evaluation scores for the same geosites. The paper also provides a comparative analysis of the assessment carried out by two different target groups - potential geotourists and geoexperts. The results obtained by AHP and descriptive statistics are quite similar, which confirms the reliability of respondents' answers and the results gained. The analyzed sites are differently positioned in the evaluation matrix, and implications are further discussed in the paper.",
publisher = "De Gruyter Open Access",
journal = "Open Geosciences",
title = "Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Zagubica Springs - Hydrological Heritage of Serbia",
volume = "10",
number = "1",
pages = "192-208",
doi = "10.1515/geo-2018-0015",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_942"
}

Miljković, Đ., Bozić, S., Miljković, L., Marković, S. B., Lukić, T., Jovanović, M., Bjelajac, D., Vasiljević, Đ. A., Vujičić, M. D.,& Ristanović, B.. (2018). Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Zagubica Springs - Hydrological Heritage of Serbia. in Open Geosciences
De Gruyter Open Access., 10(1), 192-208.
https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0015
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_942

Miljković Đ, Bozić S, Miljković L, Marković SB, Lukić T, Jovanović M, Bjelajac D, Vasiljević ĐA, Vujičić MD, Ristanović B. Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Zagubica Springs - Hydrological Heritage of Serbia. in Open Geosciences. 2018;10(1):192-208.
doi:10.1515/geo-2018-0015
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_942 .

Miljković, Đurđa, Bozić, Sanja, Miljković, Ljupče, Marković, Slobodan B., Lukić, Tin, Jovanović, Mladen, Bjelajac, Dajana, Vasiljević, Đorđije A., Vujičić, Miroslav D., Ristanović, Branko, "Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Zagubica Springs - Hydrological Heritage of Serbia" in Open Geosciences, 10, no. 1 (2018):192-208,
https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0015 .,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_942 .