Vasiljević, Đorđije A.

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
995a91b4-c380-4e79-a9f6-9769d1e10785
  • Vasiljević, Đorđije A. (2)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Zagubica Springs - Hydrological Heritage of Serbia

Miljković, Đurđa; Bozić, Sanja; Miljković, Ljupče; Marković, Slobodan B.; Lukić, Tin; Jovanović, Mladen; Bjelajac, Dajana; Vasiljević, Đorđije A.; Vujičić, Miroslav D.; Ristanović, Branko

(De Gruyter Poland Sp Zoo, Warsaw, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Miljković, Đurđa
AU  - Bozić, Sanja
AU  - Miljković, Ljupče
AU  - Marković, Slobodan B.
AU  - Lukić, Tin
AU  - Jovanović, Mladen
AU  - Bjelajac, Dajana
AU  - Vasiljević, Đorđije A.
AU  - Vujičić, Miroslav D.
AU  - Ristanović, Branko
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://gery.gef.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/942
AB  - Hydrological heritage is a relatively new concept in the field of geosite assessment. The principal aim of this study is to apply M-GAM (Modified geosite assessment model) for comparative analysis of the Krupaja spring and the Zagubica (Mlava) spring, located in Homolje area, in Eastern Serbia. According to the classification of geosites of Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, these sites are on the list of protected sites ("hydro(geo)logical" heritage sites) of extraordinary national importance; however, they still have not gained necessary recognition in Serbia. Thus, their assessment according to different target groups should provide a clearer picture of their current condition. As M-GAM considers that not all indicators for evaluation of geosites are of the same importance, this paper applies two methods for comparing and determining the importance of indicators and subindicators in the model (Analytical-hierarchy process (AHP) and descriptive statistics conducted by SPSS). Also, it is assumed that different target groups will give different importance to some indicators in the model, which would result in various evaluation scores for the same geosites. The paper also provides a comparative analysis of the assessment carried out by two different target groups - potential geotourists and geoexperts. The results obtained by AHP and descriptive statistics are quite similar, which confirms the reliability of respondents' answers and the results gained. The analyzed sites are differently positioned in the evaluation matrix, and implications are further discussed in the paper.
PB  - De Gruyter Poland Sp Zoo, Warsaw
T2  - Open Geosciences
T1  - Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Zagubica Springs - Hydrological Heritage of Serbia
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
SP  - 192
EP  - 208
DO  - 10.1515/geo-2018-0015
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_942
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Miljković, Đurđa and Bozić, Sanja and Miljković, Ljupče and Marković, Slobodan B. and Lukić, Tin and Jovanović, Mladen and Bjelajac, Dajana and Vasiljević, Đorđije A. and Vujičić, Miroslav D. and Ristanović, Branko",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Hydrological heritage is a relatively new concept in the field of geosite assessment. The principal aim of this study is to apply M-GAM (Modified geosite assessment model) for comparative analysis of the Krupaja spring and the Zagubica (Mlava) spring, located in Homolje area, in Eastern Serbia. According to the classification of geosites of Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, these sites are on the list of protected sites ("hydro(geo)logical" heritage sites) of extraordinary national importance; however, they still have not gained necessary recognition in Serbia. Thus, their assessment according to different target groups should provide a clearer picture of their current condition. As M-GAM considers that not all indicators for evaluation of geosites are of the same importance, this paper applies two methods for comparing and determining the importance of indicators and subindicators in the model (Analytical-hierarchy process (AHP) and descriptive statistics conducted by SPSS). Also, it is assumed that different target groups will give different importance to some indicators in the model, which would result in various evaluation scores for the same geosites. The paper also provides a comparative analysis of the assessment carried out by two different target groups - potential geotourists and geoexperts. The results obtained by AHP and descriptive statistics are quite similar, which confirms the reliability of respondents' answers and the results gained. The analyzed sites are differently positioned in the evaluation matrix, and implications are further discussed in the paper.",
publisher = "De Gruyter Poland Sp Zoo, Warsaw",
journal = "Open Geosciences",
title = "Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Zagubica Springs - Hydrological Heritage of Serbia",
volume = "10",
number = "1",
pages = "192-208",
doi = "10.1515/geo-2018-0015",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_942"
}
Miljković, Đ., Bozić, S., Miljković, L., Marković, S. B., Lukić, T., Jovanović, M., Bjelajac, D., Vasiljević, Đ. A., Vujičić, M. D.,& Ristanović, B.. (2018). Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Zagubica Springs - Hydrological Heritage of Serbia. in Open Geosciences
De Gruyter Poland Sp Zoo, Warsaw., 10(1), 192-208.
https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0015
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_942
Miljković Đ, Bozić S, Miljković L, Marković SB, Lukić T, Jovanović M, Bjelajac D, Vasiljević ĐA, Vujičić MD, Ristanović B. Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Zagubica Springs - Hydrological Heritage of Serbia. in Open Geosciences. 2018;10(1):192-208.
doi:10.1515/geo-2018-0015
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_942 .
Miljković, Đurđa, Bozić, Sanja, Miljković, Ljupče, Marković, Slobodan B., Lukić, Tin, Jovanović, Mladen, Bjelajac, Dajana, Vasiljević, Đorđije A., Vujičić, Miroslav D., Ristanović, Branko, "Geosite Assessment Using Three Different Methods; a Comparative Study of the Krupaja and the Zagubica Springs - Hydrological Heritage of Serbia" in Open Geosciences, 10, no. 1 (2018):192-208,
https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2018-0015 .,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_942 .
1
34
12
34

Classification of natural disasters between the legislation and application: experience of the Republic of Serbia

Lukić, Tin; Gavrilov, Milivoj B.; Marković, Slobodan B.; Komac, Blaz; Zorn, Matija; Mladjan, Dragan; Dordević, Jasmina; Milanović, Miško; Vasiljević, Đorđije A.; Vujičić, Miroslav D.; Kuzmanović, Bogdan; Prentović, Risto

(Ljubljana: Geografski inštitut Antona Melika ZRC SAZU, 2013)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lukić, Tin
AU  - Gavrilov, Milivoj B.
AU  - Marković, Slobodan B.
AU  - Komac, Blaz
AU  - Zorn, Matija
AU  - Mladjan, Dragan
AU  - Dordević, Jasmina
AU  - Milanović, Miško
AU  - Vasiljević, Đorđije A.
AU  - Vujičić, Miroslav D.
AU  - Kuzmanović, Bogdan
AU  - Prentović, Risto
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://gery.gef.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/596
AB  - The paper discusses the definitions of natural disasters and recommends the implementation of definitions and classifications of natural disasters in accordance with those decreed at the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) and Munich Re insurance Company (Munich RE) for administrative use in the Republic of Serbia. For the Republic of Serbia, the issue of natural disasters is presented both through government documents (e.g. the Law on Emergencies and the National Strategy of the Protection and Rescue in Emergencies) and the survey of the frequency and typology of disasters. Significant discrepancies exist between older and more contemporary classifications of disasters in Serbia. They are especially emphasized in comparison to the CRED and Munich RE classifications and databases. This causes problems in the monitoring, recording and assessment of the effects of natural disasters. It is proposed that definitions be adapted and implemented into legislative and other documents.
PB  - Ljubljana: Geografski inštitut Antona Melika ZRC SAZU
T2  - Acta Geographica Slovenica - Geografski zbornik
T1  - Classification of natural disasters between the legislation and application: experience of the Republic of Serbia
VL  - 53
IS  - 1
SP  - 150
EP  - 164
DO  - 10.3986/AGS53301
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_596
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Lukić, Tin and Gavrilov, Milivoj B. and Marković, Slobodan B. and Komac, Blaz and Zorn, Matija and Mladjan, Dragan and Dordević, Jasmina and Milanović, Miško and Vasiljević, Đorđije A. and Vujičić, Miroslav D. and Kuzmanović, Bogdan and Prentović, Risto",
year = "2013",
abstract = "The paper discusses the definitions of natural disasters and recommends the implementation of definitions and classifications of natural disasters in accordance with those decreed at the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) and Munich Re insurance Company (Munich RE) for administrative use in the Republic of Serbia. For the Republic of Serbia, the issue of natural disasters is presented both through government documents (e.g. the Law on Emergencies and the National Strategy of the Protection and Rescue in Emergencies) and the survey of the frequency and typology of disasters. Significant discrepancies exist between older and more contemporary classifications of disasters in Serbia. They are especially emphasized in comparison to the CRED and Munich RE classifications and databases. This causes problems in the monitoring, recording and assessment of the effects of natural disasters. It is proposed that definitions be adapted and implemented into legislative and other documents.",
publisher = "Ljubljana: Geografski inštitut Antona Melika ZRC SAZU",
journal = "Acta Geographica Slovenica - Geografski zbornik",
title = "Classification of natural disasters between the legislation and application: experience of the Republic of Serbia",
volume = "53",
number = "1",
pages = "150-164",
doi = "10.3986/AGS53301",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_596"
}
Lukić, T., Gavrilov, M. B., Marković, S. B., Komac, B., Zorn, M., Mladjan, D., Dordević, J., Milanović, M., Vasiljević, Đ. A., Vujičić, M. D., Kuzmanović, B.,& Prentović, R.. (2013). Classification of natural disasters between the legislation and application: experience of the Republic of Serbia. in Acta Geographica Slovenica - Geografski zbornik
Ljubljana: Geografski inštitut Antona Melika ZRC SAZU., 53(1), 150-164.
https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS53301
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_596
Lukić T, Gavrilov MB, Marković SB, Komac B, Zorn M, Mladjan D, Dordević J, Milanović M, Vasiljević ĐA, Vujičić MD, Kuzmanović B, Prentović R. Classification of natural disasters between the legislation and application: experience of the Republic of Serbia. in Acta Geographica Slovenica - Geografski zbornik. 2013;53(1):150-164.
doi:10.3986/AGS53301
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_596 .
Lukić, Tin, Gavrilov, Milivoj B., Marković, Slobodan B., Komac, Blaz, Zorn, Matija, Mladjan, Dragan, Dordević, Jasmina, Milanović, Miško, Vasiljević, Đorđije A., Vujičić, Miroslav D., Kuzmanović, Bogdan, Prentović, Risto, "Classification of natural disasters between the legislation and application: experience of the Republic of Serbia" in Acta Geographica Slovenica - Geografski zbornik, 53, no. 1 (2013):150-164,
https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS53301 .,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_596 .
29
19
33