TY  - JOUR
AU  - Živanović, Zora
AU  - Tošić, Branka
AU  - Đorđević, Jasmina
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://gery.gef.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/360
AB  - Regionalization of Serbia, as an instruments whose adequate use would contribute to a decrease in interregional differences in development of certain parts, represents a complex task, which is only to some extent finished by adopting bigger territorial parts in Serbia. This work is made for the purpose of presenting the problems with regional planning process deriving from inconsistency which exists between administrative territorial organization into districts of the Republic of Serbia and functional areas of regional centers defined by The Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia, issued in 1996, then functional urban areas presented in The Strategy of Spatial Development of the Republic of Serbia in 2009-2013-2020 and in The Draft Law of Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia in 2010-2014-2021. Moreover, the work compares the above mentioned spatial areas with planned regions, for which the drawing up of regional spatial plans is scheduled, namely with statistical macroregions, whose defining is one of the recently adopted decisions in the Republic of Serbia. The aim of pointing out to the above mentioned inconsistency in so far used concepts of regionalization, is to contribute to the quality of regional planning of development, as well as to finding solutions which would refer to establishing borders of smaller, meso-regional totalities, and also to the determination of authorities of both middle levels of administration in our country. .
AB  - Regionalizacija Srbije, kao jedan od instrumenata čija bi adekvatna primena i korišćenje doprineli smanjenju međuregionanih razlika u stepenu razvijenosti, predstavlja kompleksan zadatak koji je samo donekle okončan usvajanjem većih teritorijalnih celina Srbije. Cilj rada je da ukaže na probleme u procesu regionalnog planiranja koji proističu iz izvesnih nepoklapanja koja postoje između administrativno teritorijalne podele Republike Srbije na okruge i funkcionalnih područja regionalnih centara definisanih Prostornim planom Republike Srbije iz 1996, a zatim funkcionalno urbanih područja prezentovanih u Strategiji prostornog razvoja Republike Srbije 2009-2013-2020, odnosno u Nacrtu Prostornog plana Republike Srbije 2010-2014-2021. godine. Osim toga, rad poredi pomenute prostorne celine sa planskim regionima za koje je predviđena izrada regionalnih prostornih planova, odnosno, sa statističkim makro-regionima čije definisanje predstavlja jedno od najnovijih usvojenih rešenja Republike Srbije. Ukazivanje na navedene neusklađenosti koje su postojale u do sada primenjenim konceptima regionalizacije, ima za cilj da doprinese kako kvalitetu planiranja regionalnog razvoja tako i definisanju rešenja koja će se odnositi na određivanje granica manjih, mezo-regionalnih celina, kao i na utvrđivanje nadležnosti oba srednja nivoa upravljanja u našoj zemlji. .
PB  - Beograd : Srpsko geografsko društvo
T2  - Glasnik Srpskog geografskog društva
T1  - Regional types in Serbia and their territorial inconsistency
T1  - Tipovi regiona u Srbiji i njihova teritorijalna neusklađenost
VL  - 90
IS  - 2
SP  - 151
EP  - 172
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_360
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Živanović, Zora and Tošić, Branka and Đorđević, Jasmina",
year = "2010",
abstract = "Regionalization of Serbia, as an instruments whose adequate use would contribute to a decrease in interregional differences in development of certain parts, represents a complex task, which is only to some extent finished by adopting bigger territorial parts in Serbia. This work is made for the purpose of presenting the problems with regional planning process deriving from inconsistency which exists between administrative territorial organization into districts of the Republic of Serbia and functional areas of regional centers defined by The Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia, issued in 1996, then functional urban areas presented in The Strategy of Spatial Development of the Republic of Serbia in 2009-2013-2020 and in The Draft Law of Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia in 2010-2014-2021. Moreover, the work compares the above mentioned spatial areas with planned regions, for which the drawing up of regional spatial plans is scheduled, namely with statistical macroregions, whose defining is one of the recently adopted decisions in the Republic of Serbia. The aim of pointing out to the above mentioned inconsistency in so far used concepts of regionalization, is to contribute to the quality of regional planning of development, as well as to finding solutions which would refer to establishing borders of smaller, meso-regional totalities, and also to the determination of authorities of both middle levels of administration in our country. ., Regionalizacija Srbije, kao jedan od instrumenata čija bi adekvatna primena i korišćenje doprineli smanjenju međuregionanih razlika u stepenu razvijenosti, predstavlja kompleksan zadatak koji je samo donekle okončan usvajanjem većih teritorijalnih celina Srbije. Cilj rada je da ukaže na probleme u procesu regionalnog planiranja koji proističu iz izvesnih nepoklapanja koja postoje između administrativno teritorijalne podele Republike Srbije na okruge i funkcionalnih područja regionalnih centara definisanih Prostornim planom Republike Srbije iz 1996, a zatim funkcionalno urbanih područja prezentovanih u Strategiji prostornog razvoja Republike Srbije 2009-2013-2020, odnosno u Nacrtu Prostornog plana Republike Srbije 2010-2014-2021. godine. Osim toga, rad poredi pomenute prostorne celine sa planskim regionima za koje je predviđena izrada regionalnih prostornih planova, odnosno, sa statističkim makro-regionima čije definisanje predstavlja jedno od najnovijih usvojenih rešenja Republike Srbije. Ukazivanje na navedene neusklađenosti koje su postojale u do sada primenjenim konceptima regionalizacije, ima za cilj da doprinese kako kvalitetu planiranja regionalnog razvoja tako i definisanju rešenja koja će se odnositi na određivanje granica manjih, mezo-regionalnih celina, kao i na utvrđivanje nadležnosti oba srednja nivoa upravljanja u našoj zemlji. .",
publisher = "Beograd : Srpsko geografsko društvo",
journal = "Glasnik Srpskog geografskog društva",
title = "Regional types in Serbia and their territorial inconsistency, Tipovi regiona u Srbiji i njihova teritorijalna neusklađenost",
volume = "90",
number = "2",
pages = "151-172",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_360"
}

Živanović, Z., Tošić, B.,& Đorđević, J.. (2010). Regional types in Serbia and their territorial inconsistency. in Glasnik Srpskog geografskog društva
Beograd : Srpsko geografsko društvo., 90(2), 151-172.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_360

Živanović Z, Tošić B, Đorđević J. Regional types in Serbia and their territorial inconsistency. in Glasnik Srpskog geografskog društva. 2010;90(2):151-172.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_360 .

Živanović, Zora, Tošić, Branka, Đorđević, Jasmina, "Regional types in Serbia and their territorial inconsistency" in Glasnik Srpskog geografskog društva, 90, no. 2 (2010):151-172,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_360 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Dejan
AU  - Đorđević, Jasmina
PY  - 1993
UR  - https://gery.gef.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/14
AB  - Most unfortunately, protection of geological and geomorphologic monuments of nature in practice usually boils down to adoption of an administrative enactment declaring that certain area of interest is thereby protected without any firm guarantee that such enactment shall be observed. Such legislative conservation, though necessary, is not sufficient to stop the processes of mechanical and chemical degradation. Extremely complex process of planning and protection for such sites requires coordinated and planned interventions based on appropriate documentation. In addition to preservation of their essential characteristic and setting the terms of their adequate utilization, the protection plan should include elaboration and realization of technical, biological and other measures of reconstruction and protection. Examples of various approaches to protection planning for the geological and geomofphological monuments of nature could be attributed to the existing differences between the sites (type of monument, size of protected area, protection regime) and problems of financial, organizational and methodological nature. Improvement of the efficiency of the overall nature protection system is expected to enable us to apply the expounded protection planning methodology and afterwards proceed with immediate realization of the objectives set for the particular site and surrounding area, which in turn should contribute to further improvement of the protection planning methods and techniques.
AB  - Geološki i geomorfloški spomenici prirode određuju se odgovarajućim zakonom. Planiranje i zaštita geoloških i geomorfloških spomenika prirode odvija se na osnovu posebne metodologije.
PB  - Beograd : Srpsko geografsko društvo
T2  - Glasnik Srpskog geografskog društva
T1  - Protection planning for geological and geomorphological monuments of nature: Methodology and examples
T1  - Planiranje zaštite geoloških i geomorfoloških spomenika prirode - metodologija i primeri
VL  - 73
IS  - 1
SP  - 43
EP  - 50
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_14
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Dejan and Đorđević, Jasmina",
year = "1993",
abstract = "Most unfortunately, protection of geological and geomorphologic monuments of nature in practice usually boils down to adoption of an administrative enactment declaring that certain area of interest is thereby protected without any firm guarantee that such enactment shall be observed. Such legislative conservation, though necessary, is not sufficient to stop the processes of mechanical and chemical degradation. Extremely complex process of planning and protection for such sites requires coordinated and planned interventions based on appropriate documentation. In addition to preservation of their essential characteristic and setting the terms of their adequate utilization, the protection plan should include elaboration and realization of technical, biological and other measures of reconstruction and protection. Examples of various approaches to protection planning for the geological and geomofphological monuments of nature could be attributed to the existing differences between the sites (type of monument, size of protected area, protection regime) and problems of financial, organizational and methodological nature. Improvement of the efficiency of the overall nature protection system is expected to enable us to apply the expounded protection planning methodology and afterwards proceed with immediate realization of the objectives set for the particular site and surrounding area, which in turn should contribute to further improvement of the protection planning methods and techniques., Geološki i geomorfloški spomenici prirode određuju se odgovarajućim zakonom. Planiranje i zaštita geoloških i geomorfloških spomenika prirode odvija se na osnovu posebne metodologije.",
publisher = "Beograd : Srpsko geografsko društvo",
journal = "Glasnik Srpskog geografskog društva",
title = "Protection planning for geological and geomorphological monuments of nature: Methodology and examples, Planiranje zaštite geoloških i geomorfoloških spomenika prirode - metodologija i primeri",
volume = "73",
number = "1",
pages = "43-50",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_14"
}

Đorđević, D.,& Đorđević, J.. (1993). Protection planning for geological and geomorphological monuments of nature: Methodology and examples. in Glasnik Srpskog geografskog društva
Beograd : Srpsko geografsko društvo., 73(1), 43-50.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_14

Đorđević D, Đorđević J. Protection planning for geological and geomorphological monuments of nature: Methodology and examples. in Glasnik Srpskog geografskog društva. 1993;73(1):43-50.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_14 .

Đorđević, Dejan, Đorđević, Jasmina, "Protection planning for geological and geomorphological monuments of nature: Methodology and examples" in Glasnik Srpskog geografskog društva, 73, no. 1 (1993):43-50,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_14 .