Geodesign meets its institutional design in the cybernetic loop
Samo za registrovane korisnike
2020
Članak u časopisu (Objavljena verzija)
Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentuApstrakt
The paper offers a general overview of the possibilities and challenges of geodesign institutionalisation, i. e. its embedment into concomitant planning systems. The aim is to explore and suggest new areas of research regarding the institutional dimension of geodesign which could complement and enhance the rapidly developing research in its procedural dimension. Perceived as complementary to geodesign’s purpose, the cybernetic loop is used as a conceptual framework for the study. It implies organisation, interaction and co-evolution between the system with a set goal and its environment. The context of the study, the main terms and their interrelation are explained based on a literature review. geodesign institutionalisation in the cybernetic loop is sketched and used for identifying the elements of institutional design required for better informed and more collaborative process, but also more feasible geodesign studies. STEINITZ’S (2012) Geodesign Framework and BOOHER & INES’S (2002) ...network power model are interrelated and proposed for securing a more systematic approach to this endeavour. Due to the complexity and novelty of geodesign’s institutional dimension, along with conclusions, the lines of further research are proposed as well.
Ključne reči:
Computing / Cybernetic loop / Geodesign / Institutional design / Planning systemIzvor:
Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 2020, 2020, 5, 486-496Izdavač:
- Vde Verlag Gmbh
Kolekcije
Institucija/grupa
Geografski fakultetTY - JOUR AU - Dabović, Tijana PY - 2020 UR - https://gery.gef.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1075 AB - The paper offers a general overview of the possibilities and challenges of geodesign institutionalisation, i. e. its embedment into concomitant planning systems. The aim is to explore and suggest new areas of research regarding the institutional dimension of geodesign which could complement and enhance the rapidly developing research in its procedural dimension. Perceived as complementary to geodesign’s purpose, the cybernetic loop is used as a conceptual framework for the study. It implies organisation, interaction and co-evolution between the system with a set goal and its environment. The context of the study, the main terms and their interrelation are explained based on a literature review. geodesign institutionalisation in the cybernetic loop is sketched and used for identifying the elements of institutional design required for better informed and more collaborative process, but also more feasible geodesign studies. STEINITZ’S (2012) Geodesign Framework and BOOHER & INES’S (2002) network power model are interrelated and proposed for securing a more systematic approach to this endeavour. Due to the complexity and novelty of geodesign’s institutional dimension, along with conclusions, the lines of further research are proposed as well. PB - Vde Verlag Gmbh T2 - Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture T1 - Geodesign meets its institutional design in the cybernetic loop VL - 2020 IS - 5 SP - 486 EP - 496 DO - 10.14627/537690050 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_1075 ER -
@article{ author = "Dabović, Tijana", year = "2020", abstract = "The paper offers a general overview of the possibilities and challenges of geodesign institutionalisation, i. e. its embedment into concomitant planning systems. The aim is to explore and suggest new areas of research regarding the institutional dimension of geodesign which could complement and enhance the rapidly developing research in its procedural dimension. Perceived as complementary to geodesign’s purpose, the cybernetic loop is used as a conceptual framework for the study. It implies organisation, interaction and co-evolution between the system with a set goal and its environment. The context of the study, the main terms and their interrelation are explained based on a literature review. geodesign institutionalisation in the cybernetic loop is sketched and used for identifying the elements of institutional design required for better informed and more collaborative process, but also more feasible geodesign studies. STEINITZ’S (2012) Geodesign Framework and BOOHER & INES’S (2002) network power model are interrelated and proposed for securing a more systematic approach to this endeavour. Due to the complexity and novelty of geodesign’s institutional dimension, along with conclusions, the lines of further research are proposed as well.", publisher = "Vde Verlag Gmbh", journal = "Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture", title = "Geodesign meets its institutional design in the cybernetic loop", volume = "2020", number = "5", pages = "486-496", doi = "10.14627/537690050", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_1075" }
Dabović, T.. (2020). Geodesign meets its institutional design in the cybernetic loop. in Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture Vde Verlag Gmbh., 2020(5), 486-496. https://doi.org/10.14627/537690050 https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_1075
Dabović T. Geodesign meets its institutional design in the cybernetic loop. in Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture. 2020;2020(5):486-496. doi:10.14627/537690050 https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_1075 .
Dabović, Tijana, "Geodesign meets its institutional design in the cybernetic loop" in Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 2020, no. 5 (2020):486-496, https://doi.org/10.14627/537690050 ., https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_gery_1075 .